Humbly and Respectfully, Proving My Point [654321] 0 [302928]

So, interestingly enough, I’ve been expressing how it seems as though topics that I study intensely, are ones I get no credit for and somehow end up as a topic on the Coast to Coast AM show.

Well, last night I was listening to Coast to Coast Am on YouTube, the link of the episode is pasted below.

This Show was posted 21 hours ago.

In this show, that was posted 21 hours ago, a guest goes on to describe something I was talking about in an article I posted FIVE DAYS AGO. The article I posted was titled, Solving Sitchin’s 12th Planet Issue?

This is the picture from my post, it’s the Gateway of Anu in the Heavenly Abode. I saw this in my birth chart and recognized it as such; The Left side where the seven stars are represents the astrological sign of Pisces. On the right side where the crescent moon is, that is the Astrological sign of Aquarius. There’s one large column on the right and one large column on the left, and the center is the doorway, or gateway.

The symbol above the door, I’m telling you that symbol represents the planet Mercury on the zero degree of Pisces. Mercury is the Good Shepard, it’s Thoth in Egypt, it’s Hermes in Greek, it was Mercury in Rome, and it was Christ Jesus.

Those columns block out Aquarius, and they isolate the zero degree of Pisces in the center, separating it from the 1st degree of Pisces. [654321/0/302928]

In the Coast to Coast Am show, they said the symbol above the door wasn’t Mercury, but Planet Nibiru. As of right now, Nibiru was never proven to exist-it’s a hypothetical plant, but according to the show’s guest, Nibiru was illuminated by our Sun as it orbited the sun in 1999, and that’s how it appeared from earth.

That’s his opinion, and he’s entitled to it, and it doesn’t bother me that he’s trying to disprove what I said, I’m more interested in knowing how everything I study in the privacy of my bedroom ends up being a topic on Coast to Coast AM-immediately.

Now, why is the Zero Degree of Pisces so important? Because, as I indicated in the post before that one, which was six days ago, that cusp line that runs in between Aquarius and Pisces and Virgo and Leo, is the line of time. The Grand Cycle began approximately 26,000 years ago in between Aquarius and Pisces, and we’ll be approaching that point again in 2100 AD, which is the completion of that 26,000 year cycle, and the 2,160 year astrological age of Pisces.

Here’s another tidbit of proof of what I’m saying that I left out of that post six days because I just found it yesterday.

Look at the picture with the seven stars. The arrangement of stars in that photo can mean one of two things:

According to Geomancy, it can only represent Joy (Pisces), or Sadness (Aquarius).

Now, because that point marks the beginning and the end of the Grand Cycle, it would only make sense, since the those figures are the exact same (the only different is one is pointed upwards, while the other is inverted or pointed downwards) that both figures, Tristitia and Laetitia are represented by one. Because the end of anything and the beginning of something new is always marked by a time of Joy or Sorrow depending on how you look at it. Are you sad to see it go, or are you Joyful that something new is beginning?

Either way, this symbol further proves my point that that location is the Aquarius and Pisces border, and that symbol represents Mercury.

Leave a comment